In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the smart #3 Pro beats the SsangYong Korando e-Motion by 118 minutes, completing the 1487km route in 15h 26min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The SsangYong Korando e-Motion's 271km range doesn't beat the smart #3 Pro's 250km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #3 Pro needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #3 Pro
- Total time: 15h 26min (118 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 30min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1487km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #3 Pro |
SsangYong Korando e-Motion |
| Travel time |
15h 26min |
17h 24min |
| Charging time: |
1h 30min |
3h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~268 kWh |
~268 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #3 Pro Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Frankenwald West, Berg (10 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (10 min, 23% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Mies-van-der-Rohe-Straße, München (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (20 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 5:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (19 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (10 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Rome
SsangYong Korando e-Motion Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf, Heidegrund (16 min, 20% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (17 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Mies-van-der-Rohe-Straße, München (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle, Garmisch-Partenkirchen (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 7:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (27 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (21 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (16 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
Cantagallo Ovest, Casalecchio di Reno (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 12:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (19 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 13:
Giove Ovest, Giove (13 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the smart #3 Pro Won
The smart #3 Pro achieved a 118-minute advantage over SsangYong Korando e-Motion on this 1487km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 30min vs 3h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons