In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the smart #3 Pro+ beats the SsangYong Korando e-Motion by 96 minutes, completing the 1485km route in 15h 45min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #3 Pro+ needs only 8 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #3 Pro+
- Total time: 15h 45min (96 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 46min
- Energy: ~263 kWh
- Distance: 1485km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #3 Pro+ |
SsangYong Korando e-Motion |
| Travel time |
15h 45min |
17h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 46min |
3h 18min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~267 kWh |
~268 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #3 Pro+ Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Via del Lago (16 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Langenbruck A9 (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Hecht Einrichtungen (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Berlin
SsangYong Korando e-Motion Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Arezzo Park Hotel (10 min, 22% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Via del Lago (17 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Campogalliano Est (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
Povegliano Est (18 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Paganella Est (27 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Hofer (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (17 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Frankenwald Ost (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 12:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (17 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 13:
TotalEnergies Autohof (18 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the smart #3 Pro+ Won
The smart #3 Pro+ achieved a 96-minute advantage over SsangYong Korando e-Motion on this 1485km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 46min vs 3h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~263 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons