In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 51 minutes, completing the 1626km route in 16h 20min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 20min (51 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~265 kWh
- Distance: 1626km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
16h 20min |
17h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 24% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledi MS (31 min, 11% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Novovysočanská (10 min, 32% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (38 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (40 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 51-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1626km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~265 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons