In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 133 minutes, completing the 1627km route in 16h 40min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 40min (133 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~299 kWh
- Distance: 1627km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
16h 40min |
18h 53min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
3h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (18 min, 15% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 11% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bahnhof Neustadt (14 min, 47% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Karlov (10 min, 11% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Páty Nord (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (34 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (71 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 27%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 133-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1627km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 3h 39min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~299 kWh vs ~359 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons