In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 119 minutes, completing the 1614km route in 16h 18min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 18min (119 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~296 kWh
- Distance: 1614km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
16h 18min |
18h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
2h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~291 kWh |
~291 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pávov Sever (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (18 min, 53% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (44 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Ladná směr Brno (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 7:
OC Karlov (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King Kutnohorská (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Rasthof Berstetal (10 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 119-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1614km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 2h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~296 kWh vs ~356 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons