In our Bern to Athens EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 92 minutes, completing the 2391km route in 26h 4min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 4min (92 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 4min
- Energy: ~439 kWh
- Distance: 2391km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 36min |
26h 4min |
| Charging time: |
3h 27min |
2h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~430 kWh |
~426 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (17 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (12 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 4:
Petrol (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (36 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Park Hotel Polykastro (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Skotina dir Athen (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Shell (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 18% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Korinos dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 92-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2391km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 4min vs 3h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~439 kWh vs ~443 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons