In our Bern to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 26 minutes, completing the 891km route in 9h 26min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 26min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~160 kWh
- Distance: 891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 26min |
9h 52min |
| Charging time: |
23min |
49min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~160 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra expert TechnoMarkt (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Ansfelden Süd (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Autohaus Seitz (14 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 26-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons