In our Bern to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 20 minutes, completing the 630km route in 6h 37min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 6h 37min (20 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~103 kWh
- Distance: 630km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
6h 37min |
6h 57min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
28min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~113 kWh |
~113 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Keskastel Est (10 min, 46% → 74%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Keskastel Est (10 min, 18% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Cora (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 20-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 630km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~103 kWh vs ~104 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons