In our Brussels to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 21 minutes, completing the 633km route in 6h 36min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 6h 36min (21 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~103 kWh
- Distance: 633km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
6h 36min |
6h 57min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
28min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~114 kWh |
~114 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 35% → 70%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire du Haut Koenigsbourg (16 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 21-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 633km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~103 kWh vs ~105 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons