In our Bern to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron quattro by 43 minutes, completing the 1891km route in 19h 54min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 54min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~309 kWh
- Distance: 1891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron quattro |
| Travel time |
19h 54min |
20h 37min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 26% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (13 min, 11% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron quattro Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tankstelle Gewerbegebiet Neusiedl Nord (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (29 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron quattro on this 1891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~309 kWh vs ~356 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons