In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron quattro by 32 minutes, completing the 1889km route in 19h 54min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 54min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~308 kWh
- Distance: 1889km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron quattro |
| Travel time |
19h 54min |
20h 26min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron quattro Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (14 min, 23% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Nord (10 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron quattro on this 1889km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 1h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~308 kWh vs ~355 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons