In our Bern to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 118 minutes, completing the 1891km route in 19h 48min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 14, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 48min (118 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 48min |
21h 46min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 46min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Franz-Marc-Straße (14 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
da emobil Burger King Gaudenzdorfer Gürtel (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bábolna (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (28 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 8:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (29 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 118-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~298 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons