In our Bern to Budapest EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 34 minutes, completing the 1076km route in 10h 53min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 53min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~198 kWh
- Distance: 1076km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 53min |
11h 27min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~194 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 11% → 59%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
JET Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Hietzinger Kai (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1076km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons