In our Budapest to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 35 minutes, completing the 1067km route in 10h 55min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 55min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~196 kWh
- Distance: 1067km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 55min |
11h 30min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Burger King (10 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Migrol (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle Wientalstraße (10 min, 28% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Salzburger Straße (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Franz-Marc-Straße (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Migrol Service (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1067km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons