In our Bern to Dublin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 48 minutes, completing the 1498km route in 18h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 57min (48 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~275 kWh
- Distance: 1498km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 45min |
18h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 51min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~270 kWh |
~269 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Lotissement de L’Autoroute (12 min, 21% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Champ Roland (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Village Hotel (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Moto Toddington Northbound (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Village Hotel (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 8:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 20%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Langres Noidant (10 min, 47% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 19% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 48-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1498km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 1h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~275 kWh vs ~277 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons