In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 67 minutes, completing the 1771km route in 19h 15min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 15min (67 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~289 kWh
- Distance: 1771km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 15min |
20h 22min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
2h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Großburgwedel (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Burger King (10 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (13 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger KFC (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (12 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 67-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1771km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 2h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~289 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons