In our Oslo to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 68 minutes, completing the 1773km route in 19h 17min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 17min (68 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 55min
- Energy: ~289 kWh
- Distance: 1773km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 17min |
20h 25min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
2h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Sannarp (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Allego Erhvervspark (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund West (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
XXXLutz Mann Mobilia (12 min, 11% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 32% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Burger King (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund West (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Reinhardshain Nord (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Am Hockenheimring West (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Park & Ride Pendlerparkplatz (15 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 68-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1773km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 55min vs 2h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~289 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons