In our Oslo to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 65 minutes, completing the 1771km route in 19h 35min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 35min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~289 kWh
- Distance: 1771km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 35min |
20h 40min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
2h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (10 min, 32% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Debyestraße (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 32% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Burger King (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
KFC (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Tecklenburger Land West (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
SWD Ladepark Fährstraße (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (18 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1771km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 2h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~289 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons