In our Paris to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 71 minutes, completing the 1780km route in 19h 26min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 26min (71 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 55min
- Energy: ~290 kWh
- Distance: 1780km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 26min |
20h 37min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW Vennbahncenter (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (11 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
AVIA Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Uno-X Danmark (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bierset (10 min, 15% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Lütticher Straße Süd (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (12 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 71-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1780km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 55min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~290 kWh vs ~329 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons