In our Bern to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 766km route in 7h 40min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 7h 40min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~119 kWh
- Distance: 766km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
7h 40min |
8h 11min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
40min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~138 kWh |
~138 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Autohof Schwabach West (10 min, 18% → 63%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
mblty Agip Tankstelle (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Frankenhöhe Süd (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Ursensollen (10 min, 12% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Kladruby jih (10 min, 14% → 47%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 766km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~119 kWh vs ~127 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons