In our Bern to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 38 minutes, completing the 857km route in 9h 15min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023
- Total time: 9h 15min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~129 kWh
- Distance: 857km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 |
| Travel time |
9h 53min |
9h 15min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
21min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Muggiano Ovest (17 min, 16% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Ovest (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (10 min, 36% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Arno Ovest (11 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 Won
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Highland 2023 achieved a 38-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 857km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~129 kWh vs ~135 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons