In our Bern to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 882km route in 9h 53min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 53min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~144 kWh
- Distance: 882km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 53min |
10h 24min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~159 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lambro Sud (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Monte Alto Sud (13 min, 20% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 5:
Petrol (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 882km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~144 kWh vs ~146 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons