In our Zagreb to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 34 minutes, completing the 895km route in 9h 54min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 54min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 31min
- Energy: ~146 kWh
- Distance: 895km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 54min |
10h 28min |
| Charging time: |
31min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~161 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 69% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (10 min, 13% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Novate Nord (11 min, 12% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 53% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Be Charge Bazzera Nord (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Via Sumatra (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 895km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 31min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~146 kWh vs ~148 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons