In our Bern to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 28 minutes, completing the 882km route in 9h 56min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 56min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~162 kWh
- Distance: 882km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 56min |
10h 24min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~159 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lambro Sud (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Monte Alto Sud (13 min, 20% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 5:
Petrol (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 882km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons