In our Zagreb to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 28 minutes, completing the 882km route in 10h 0min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 0min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~162 kWh
- Distance: 882km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 0min |
10h 28min |
| Charging time: |
23min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~159 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Novate Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 53% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Be Charge Bazzera Nord (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Via Sumatra (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 882km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons