In our Zagreb to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 30 minutes, completing the 975km route in 10h 26min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 26min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~179 kWh
- Distance: 975km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 26min |
10h 56min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~176 kWh |
~175 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Plenitude On The Road Eni Tankstelle Dallingerstraße (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 21% → 62%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (13 min, 17% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Palasino (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Esso Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 975km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons