In our Zagreb to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 30 minutes, completing the 871km route in 8h 49min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 49min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~160 kWh
- Distance: 871km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 49min |
9h 19min |
| Charging time: |
21min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~157 kWh |
~160 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 12% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 53% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Autogrill Po Ovest (10 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 871km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons