In our Bratislava to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 30 minutes, completing the 890km route in 9h 24min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 24min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 19min
- Energy: ~139 kWh
- Distance: 890km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 24min |
9h 54min |
| Charging time: |
19min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~160 kWh |
~160 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Brucker Straße (19 min, 12% → 78%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 17% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 23% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Büsisee Nord (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 890km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 19min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~139 kWh vs ~147 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons