In our Bratislava to Bern EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 8 minutes, completing the 891km route in 9h 43min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 9h 43min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~199 kWh
- Distance: 891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
9h 51min |
9h 43min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
39min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~160 kWh |
~160 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 31% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (14 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Migrol Service (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JET Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Stegen (11 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons