In our Bern to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 4 minutes, completing the 893km route in 9h 42min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 9h 42min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 893km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
9h 46min |
9h 42min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~161 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (10 min, 24% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Bäckerei Bachmeier (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (11 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Allego Total Autohof (14 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Innpark (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Weierbachweg (10 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 893km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons