In our Bratislava to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 85 minutes, completing the 1649km route in 19h 46min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 46min (85 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~257 kWh
- Distance: 1649km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 46min |
21h 11min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
2h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~297 kWh |
~297 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW Hypernetz Am Fiebig (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Farø (17 min, 14% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
PRE Naháč (20 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Rasthof Berstetal (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 85-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1649km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~257 kWh vs ~262 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons