In our Bratislava to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range by 29 minutes, completing the 1302km route in 12h 32min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 32min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~212 kWh
- Distance: 1302km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range |
| Travel time |
12h 32min |
13h 1min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~234 kWh |
~235 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (17 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
BFS Business Fleet Services (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (15 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range on this 1302km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 1h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons