In our Paris to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range by 29 minutes, completing the 1303km route in 12h 30min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 30min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~213 kWh
- Distance: 1303km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range |
| Travel time |
12h 30min |
12h 59min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~235 kWh |
~235 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mitfahrerparkplatz PRE-Park (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohof Schwabach West (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Geistkircher Straße Rohrbach (11 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (10 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range on this 1303km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons