In our Bratislava to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance by 4 minutes, completing the 1286km route in 14h 15min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance's 604km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance's 576km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 15min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~210 kWh
- Distance: 1286km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 15min |
14h 19min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
47min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (22 min, 12% → 82%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (17 min, 19% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY (10 min, 20% → 62%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1286km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons