In our Riga to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 2 minutes, completing the 1289km route in 14h 14min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 14min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~201 kWh
- Distance: 1289km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 16min |
14h 14min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
41min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 29% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (17 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 2-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1289km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~201 kWh vs ~210 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons