In our Bratislava to Riga EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 19 minutes, completing the 1285km route in 15h 12min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 15h 12min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1285km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
15h 12min |
15h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (15 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (26 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (32 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 5:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 22% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (37 min, 11% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 23%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 22% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 19-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1285km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons