In our Bratislava to Rome EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 1141km route in 12h 22min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 22min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 23min
- Energy: ~180 kWh
- Distance: 1141km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 39min |
12h 22min |
| Charging time: |
1h 36min |
1h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~205 kWh |
~205 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Köstle Mietpark (11 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledra Ovest (15 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (15 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (13 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Giove Ovest (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (16 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Fratta Nord (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Arno Ovest (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1141km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 23min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~180 kWh vs ~193 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons