In our Rome to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 24 minutes, completing the 1135km route in 12h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 24min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~179 kWh
- Distance: 1135km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 48min |
12h 24min |
| Charging time: |
1h 43min |
1h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~204 kWh |
~204 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (15 min, 19% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (21 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Fella Est (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Park+Drive Wiener Neustadt Ost (10 min, 11% → 41%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Fella Est (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Mer Ladepark (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 24-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1135km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~179 kWh vs ~192 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons