In our Brussels to Bern EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 7 minutes, completing the 639km route in 7h 5min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 7h 5min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~101 kWh
- Distance: 639km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 12min |
7h 5min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~115 kWh |
~115 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen (10 min, 20% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (14 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Sonnenberg West (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen (10 min, 25% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Lidl (28 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 7-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 639km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~101 kWh vs ~108 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons