In our Bern to Brussels EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 636km route in 7h 3min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 7h 3min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~100 kWh
- Distance: 636km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 13min |
7h 3min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
34min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~114 kWh |
~113 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl (10 min, 22% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 22% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Lidl (10 min, 12% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Q8 (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Keskastel Est (14 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Cora (20 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 636km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~100 kWh vs ~108 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons