In our Brussels to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 35 e-tron by 124 minutes, completing the 1554km route in 15h 50min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 50min (124 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 47min
- Energy: ~254 kWh
- Distance: 1554km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 35 e-tron |
| Travel time |
15h 50min |
17h 54min |
| Charging time: |
47min |
2h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~280 kWh |
~281 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Blois-Villerbon (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire des Groies (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (10 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q4 35 e-tron Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Ressons Ouest (11 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Limours-Janvry (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY McDonald's (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Ste Maure de Touraine (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire des Groies (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger McDonald's (16 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Repsol Lopidana (11 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Área de Servicio Milagros (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 124-minute advantage over Audi Q4 35 e-tron on this 1554km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 47min vs 2h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~254 kWh vs ~296 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons