In our Brussels to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 35 e-tron by 105 minutes, completing the 1454km route in 14h 54min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 54min (105 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1454km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 35 e-tron |
| Travel time |
14h 54min |
16h 39min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
2h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~262 kWh |
~263 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire du Haut Koenigsbourg, Orschwiller (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q4 35 e-tron Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Howald, Luxemburg (12 min, 19% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest, Keskastel (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost, Basel (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Migrol Rotzlochstrasse, Stans (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Lario Ovest, Cadorago (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 11:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (16 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 105-minute advantage over Audi Q4 35 e-tron on this 1454km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 2h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~237 kWh vs ~277 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons