In our Brussels to Milan EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 12 minutes, completing the 882km route in 10h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 10h 3min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~139 kWh
- Distance: 882km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 15min |
10h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
58min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~159 kWh |
~159 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen, Terwen (10 min, 20% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest, Keskastel (14 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
GOFAST Basel-Ost, Basel (10 min, 16% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Migrol Rotzlochstrasse, Stans (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (17 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Milan
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen, Terwen (10 min, 25% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest, Keskastel (10 min, 21% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (13 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Knutwil Süd, Knutwil (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 12-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 882km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~139 kWh vs ~149 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons