In our Milan to Brussels EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 8 minutes, completing the 879km route in 10h 4min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 10h 4min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~139 kWh
- Distance: 879km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 12min |
10h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 6min |
1h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~158 kWh |
~157 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Coop Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
GOFAST Basel-Ost (11 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Cora (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Lidl (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Q8 (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Milan (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Gunzgen Nord (27 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Keskastel Est (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shopping Cora (20 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 879km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 1h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~139 kWh vs ~149 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons