In our Brussels to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 1467km route in 16h 32min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 32min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~228 kWh
- Distance: 1467km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 32min |
16h 45min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
KFC (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Autohof Vechta (10 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Lynladestation (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1467km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~228 kWh vs ~269 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons