In our Brussels to Oslo EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Kia EV9 by 12 minutes, completing the 1469km route in 16h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Kia EV9's 450km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 16h 48min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1469km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia EV9 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
17h 0min |
16h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 8min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (10 min, 23% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
KFC (10 min, 19% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (14 min, 16% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Tradenvägen (12 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Autohof Vechta (11 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Lynladestation (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 12-minute advantage over Kia EV9 on this 1469km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~310 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons