In our Oslo to Brussels EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Kia EV9 by 13 minutes, completing the 1468km route in 16h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Kia EV9's 450km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 16h 47min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~258 kWh
- Distance: 1468km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia EV9 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
17h 0min |
16h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 6min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~264 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (15 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (11 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Venlose Heide (10 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Trave (11 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Autohof (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 13-minute advantage over Kia EV9 on this 1468km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~258 kWh vs ~310 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons