In our Brussels to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 80 minutes, completing the 1453km route in 14h 52min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 52min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~226 kWh
- Distance: 1453km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 52min |
16h 12min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~262 kWh |
~263 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Saverne Monswiller, Eckartswiller (10 min, 32% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
GoFast Area Servizio Gottardo Sud, Ambri (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger SuperGreen, Terwen (10 min, 25% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest, Keskastel (10 min, 21% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Rue du Rosenkranz, Houssen (13 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Knutwil Süd, Knutwil (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lavorgo Sud, Faido (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Muggiano Ovest, Milano (13 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
San Martino Ovest, Parma (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 80-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1453km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~226 kWh vs ~229 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons