In our Brussels to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Skoda ENYAQ 85 by 110 minutes, completing the 2070km route in 20h 24min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 24min (110 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 19min
- Energy: ~322 kWh
- Distance: 2070km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Skoda ENYAQ 85 |
| Travel time |
20h 24min |
22h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 19min |
2h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~373 kWh |
~374 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (11 min, 28% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Trieben (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Skoda ENYAQ 85 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Medenbach West (10 min, 17% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
EWE Go McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Ladepark wild & bolz eMotel (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (33 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 110-minute advantage over Skoda ENYAQ 85 on this 2070km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 19min vs 2h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~322 kWh vs ~362 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons