In our Sofia to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Skoda ENYAQ 85 by 91 minutes, completing the 2070km route in 20h 16min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 16min (91 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~322 kWh
- Distance: 2070km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Skoda ENYAQ 85 |
| Travel time |
20h 16min |
21h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~373 kWh |
~374 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (12 min, 70% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (18 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Skoda ENYAQ 85 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 62% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (12 min, 19% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Emmezeta Jankomir (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 38%)
-
Stop 7:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Haidt Nord (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
OBI Markt (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (12 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 91-minute advantage over Skoda ENYAQ 85 on this 2070km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~322 kWh vs ~362 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons